Pavlović dobro prošao – nema preloma

Milan 1972, 1973, 2005, 2006, 2012; Inter mozda '61 i mozda i '98 jer i za prvu od te dve sezone moze da se povede pitanje da li bi bas bili prvi i na kraju, isto tako, iako jeste po pravilima da domaci tim sluzbeno bude kaznjen zbog upada publike, valjda niko normalan nije u dubini duse protiv toga da utakmica ipak bude odigrana i da to bude reseno na terenu i sa najjacim sastavima; Roma '81, mozda i '02 (oni bili drugi); Fiorentina '82 Parma '97 Napoli '18; znaci, 9-10 sigurnih kradja i jos 2-3 izvesne, a gde je tek cuvena rubeova doping afera sredinom devedesetih zbog koje su sporne i '95 i '97 i '98, a, samim tim, i '96 u LS setite se samo da je i marsej '93 bio dopingovan u prvom finalu Lige sampiona, ali ta njihova titula je ostala i nije im tad oduzeta jer je uefa procenila da je tako bolje. Interu ne pripada titula dodeljena 2006. godine, a sporne svakako jesu i one titule iz '08 i '10.

AC Milan have made a call to the Italian Refereeing Association to let them know that they are furious with the amount of errors against them. La Gazzetta dello Sport report that the call was made one day after Milan-Como, amid anger over Strahinja Pavlovic’s injury. The defender received studs on his shin from Van der Brempt, from which he was lucky not to fracture his leg, and Mariani’s did not even issue a yellow card to the defender. It was immediately clear from the pitch that the tackle was particularly harsh and, above all, dangerous. After reviewing the incident again, nobody at Casa Milan and Milanello could explain why there wasn’t a check from VAR and a red card. This isn’t the first incident in 2025-26 that has left Milan’s management perplexed, and for this reason, a call was sent to the AIA (Italian Referees’ Association) yesterday. It was not a formal protest, but a polite way to make it clear that they don’t like what’s happening in terms of refereeing decisions. The Pavlovic case The results of the Serbian defender’s tests yesterday are clear: “Large soft tissue hematoma and edematous-hemorrhagic imbibition of the fibula bone without cortical disruption.” There was concern at San Siro on Wednesday evening, so much so that the player left the stadium with sliders on, with his ankle in a brace, and used the elevator to reach the garage (he obviously didn’t drive). The possibility of a fibula fracture – meaning he would be out of action until 2026-27 – wasn’t far-fetched, given the impact of the studs in a very dangerous spot. Such a challenge must be punished with a card, probably a red in the eyes of the club. Milan’s bitterness over this is palpable, especially since playing with a man advantage for more than half of the match would have (perhaps) changed the course of the game and the title race. Pavlovic, however, was forced to come off at half-time, so Milan were penalised again. Fabregas gets away with it Allegri was then sent off for going to defend Alexis Saelemaekers after the incident with Fabregas. Along with Max, Como director Davide Cattaneo and a member of the coaching staff, Diego Perez Castillo, were also sent off. Fabregas admitted his mistake in front of reporters, and Milan believe that he deserved the red card for holding Saelemaekers by his shirt. Instead, Allegri paid the price, receiving his third red card of the season after those against Bologna (at home) and Lazio. Trusty assistant Marco Landucci will be on the bench on Sunday, and Max will watch Milan-Parma from the stands. Including the two Coppa Italia games against Bari and Lecce, missed due to a suspension dating back to his time at Juventus, he has already experienced five as a spectator. The two have a strong connection because they’ve worked together for twenty years and see football alike, but the absence of their coach against the Gialloblù will still be a handicap for Maignan and his team-mates. Having Adrien Rabiot back is a boost, but he will return just one yellow away from another suspension after what happened in Pisa. A single card (the first), given the severity of the contact with Leris, was already considered excessive by the Rossoneri. To get a second for protesting is something that the club do not accept. Also because, when it comes to protests (like Luka Modric in Rome, also booked after confronting a player who shoved him from behind), not all players at the big clubs are treated equally. A necessary call On Wednesday, Milan avoided making controversial references to Mariani’s management and the VAR system in front of cameras and notebooks. During this turbulent period for Rocchi (the referee designator) and his team, the management’s attitude has been one of responsibility and balance. Last week, Gerry Cardinale spoke with Serie A officials about the new stadium, foreign TV rights and the expansion of Italian football. At the same time, however, not all of the referees’ decisions have pleased the Rossoneri, and this has been politely pointed out to AIA in recent hours. There is Pulisic’s unfairly disallowed goal against Sassuolo (it would have made it 3-1, but the match ended 2-2). No one has yet found an explanation for either the penalty not awarded to Nkunku in the first leg won against Bologna or for Moreo’s tackle on Gabbia which helped Pisa’s Nzola make it 2-1 at San Siro. The penalty figures are also stark: Milan are the team who have had the most penalties against them (7) after Napoli (8). This is enough to warrant a call to the AIA and to hope that certain cases will not happen again. At Milanello, they want a season finale without negative controversy.

"Nico Paz da je dobio zasluženi karton u prošlom kolu, sinoć ne bi mogao da igra a još je postigao gol... što se tiče igrača Coma, zar jedan nije napravio faul za žuti nad Strahinjom a onda kasnije i nad Maignanom ? Dakle dva žuta odnosno crveni ? Ako gledamo da je Saleu oprošten, to je makar bilo na kraju meča, dok igrač Coma je trebao biti isključen mnogo ranije. Nije sinoć sudija kriv što je Milan izgubio dva boda, ali jesu SUDIJE iz kola u kolo ponavljaju greške, evo i ove indirektne kao u slučaju Paza na kraju na štetu Milana. I ima veze suđenje u Italiji sa igrama u Evropi. Nisu navikli ljudi na taj ritam, gdje sve mora i gdje se sve svira u njihovu korist, tamo postoji i druga strana. Neću je ja tražiti ali možeš se i sam potruditi pa vidjeti ko je najviše pogođen sudijskim odlukama u poslednjih par sezona, a ko je najviše profitirao od istih... pametnom dosta ali ako ćemo se praviti nekakvi filozofi, raspravi nikad kraja ne bi bilo."

Strahinja armirani beton Pavlović

Ovaj njihov mamlaz za to nije dobio ni zuti, ali zato je VELIKI problem to sto Selemekers nije dobio drugi zuti, bas nema nikakve veze to sto drugi igraci (a i trener) dobijaju nepravedne zute i crvene kartone, ovo je neoprostivo.

Sporting Judge: Fabregas left unpunished for now as Allegri’s ban is confirmed This morning, the Sporting Judge has released its standard statement about the action from the previous day, and AC Milan may be a little shocked. Given it was the only game left of the matchday, the Sporting Judge has released a specific statement for the game between Milan and Como, detailing the outcomes of the suspensions, and there is shockingly no mention of Cesc Fabregas. Sports Judge’s decisions post Milan-Como As Calciomercato.com relays, the report states that Allegri will be suspended for one game, for ‘in the 34th minute of the second half, leaving the technical area to argue with a director of the opposing team’. Diego Perez Castillo and Davide Cattaneo were also mentioned, the former for leaving the bench to contest a decision, ‘generating a tense atmosphere’, whilst the latter was given a suspension for leaving the bench to argue with Allegri. Fabregas Allegri Saelemaekers Within the statement, there is no mention of the event which kicked off the drama – which was Fabregas holding Alexis Saelemaekers back from properly pressing the ball, which he has since apologised for. Perhaps there will be a later statement about the incident, but if there is nothing for Fabregas’ actions, it sets a terrible precedent for the league.

When coaches get involved: Milan rightly furious after Chivu and Fabregas incidents This season, AC Milan have been subjected to a few occasions where managers have been wrongly involved in games, yet nothing has ever been done with it. Last night’s involvement from Cesc Fabregas brings up an uneasy question again, why are Milan the victims of coaches getting involved in games. If it were once now and again, it would be fair enough. However, this is the second time this season alone where coaches have played potentially influential roles. Multiple incidents in 12 months Fabregas preventing Alexis Saelemaekers from getting close to his players could have played a huge role in Como potentially scoring. The contact was clear, and caught on film. Yet, Massimiliano Allegri was sent off. It seems like nothing will happen to the Spaniard too, with the Sporting Judge not passing a comment on the situation. All this whilst the Diavolo will now be without Allegri on the sidelines for a game for protesting against the flaw. This is the second time in a vital game where this has happened. Of course, against Inter earlier in the season, Cristian Chivu go infront of Adrien Rabiot to stop him from taking a throw in, in a key moment of the game. Rabiot Chivu It is not even a case of an accidental step, given he looked directly at him and held his arms up to stop the throw in from being taken. Whilst the pair laughed it off, it is a direct involvement of play, which managers cannot do. You can even look to last season where Simone Inzaghi was accused of ‘man-marking’ Theo Hernandez in the derby. The Italian was outside of his technical area and blocked a straight run for the Frenchman. The fact that none of these incidents were spotted or dealt with by officials raises questions about how often this can occur. Again, if this was one incident, it would be understandable. However, this is three occasions in less than 12 months, all in key games. Ultimately, it needs discussing. Moving forward So, where do Milan go from here? We must await if there will be any conversations about the matter in the near future, and whether Fabregas will be fined or suspended for his actions, given he has already admitted to getting involved in play. It’s unsportsmanlike, and it does Italian football no favours to see these incidents regularly go without punishment. How often does it happen in other elite leagues or competitions…